My third UFO sighting (8-24-10)

Last night, my brother-in-law (Nery) and I were outside the front of my house around eleven. We were just chit chatting -talking about the various aspects of evolution, and how it fails- he was having a "smoke break" and I was sipping my cup of joe. Off in the distance, above the tree line, I noticed a bright object in the sky. Keep in mind that I'm a true skeptic at heart. I hate addressing and dealing with things unknown -I don't even like wrapped birthday presents- I like having answers but to this, I do not. Well, not a definitive one but a speculative one only.

This object was very bright and blinking various colors, alternating from red, yellow, white, and blue. What seemed at random, was that every once in awhile a solid flash of light -of the various colors- would come from the object. Nery told me that he had never seen anything like that. I told him, "are you sure that's not a planet or a star"? I know for sure it wasn't a plane or helicopter. He told me that neither would flash such a spectrum of color the way it did. The skeptic that I am, I said, "are you sure, are you really sure"? He said YES!

As we were discussing it, we were both analyzing it's height, position, and relation to the tree line. There were also telephone lines that we could use as a gauge for it's position in the sky. If I may add, he's an architect. He has a trained eye for calculations of various objects and their relation to each other. After about thirty minutes, it slowly started drifting, ever so slow, down and to the right of the tree that it was above when we first saw it. And it was a good distance above it when first saw the object. Nery noted to me that it for sure didn't have a flightpath of a plane or a helicopter. Of course all of the colors didn't match up either.

At this time, I knocked on the door of my neighbors (Johnny and Melissa) and they came out to see it. Without telling them anything of our "analysis" of the object -other than an apparent UFO- I asked them to look at the section of sky (where we saw this) and tell us what they see. Johnny spoke up and said exactly what we had been talking about for the past thirty minutes prior, before knocking on his door. I also wanted them to look so we had a testimony of four witnesses, other than Nery and I. Perhaps just us two were delusional? Nope. I asked Johnny if he had a good camera where we could take a picture, or a video. He took a decent amount of pictures, but they all came out grainy and at best, it couldn't make out the various colors, or its brightness. After all, he was using his iPhone that boasts only a 5.0 megapixel. Where was that Droid 8.0 megapixel when we needed it? Mr. Jobs you let us down man. Finally Johnny and Melissa went back into their house for the night. Nery and I watched the object slowly move and fade to where we almost couldn't see it anymore. The whole event lasted about an hour. Luke 21:11? I think so...

L. A. Marzulli Conference Overview

Politics, Prophecy & the Supernatural Conference (7-31-10)
---Los Angeles---

In a conference that was 8 hours packed full of information, and lectured by one man, I'm still catching my breath to process this information--- to compute from the download. There was a lot of ground for L. A. Marzulli to cover on various topics in this span of time. He systematically laid down the foundation of seemingly unrelated world events though the centuries, but as the conference was winding down, he nicely connected the dots. He did so in terms that a layman could understand, or handle, while at the same time a seasoned researcher could appreciate. His charismatic personality, amusing humor, and humble demeanor were great tools to help the audience relax in order to better take in the barrage of critical, and even frightening information.


Once his lecture/s concluded, and he went to the Q and A section of the conference, I was rather tempted to ask a plethora of questions that were swimming around in my think tank. However, I refrained as not to hijack the time and experience from the other attendees. But I did have 50 questions loaded in the chamber, only joking---49. I would highly recommend going to see him in a conference and buying his books. You will not be disappointed, trust me. What all did he talk about? Go buy the book, I did. Here's his website ---> http://www.lamarzulli.net/index.htm

(Yours Truly and L. A. Marzulli)

Stonehenge: Land of the Dead

Stonehenge has been said by some to be "the land of the dead". With that noted, I have something interesting to consider. Numerous people have asserted that the Giants/Nephilim of the ancient world built the large ancient structures from around the globe, megaliths-including Stonehenge, Gigal Rephaim etc. In Hebrew, there are two words for the dead, one being mûth (general word for deceased) and râphâ'. The râphâ' (rephaim plural) from my exegesis are the disembodied spirits of the Nephilim, which were not normal humans, but hybrids. Various sources including Bible concordances, lexicons etc say that these rephaim are shades or ghosts. Some say, including Enoch, that these are the demons. Could these be the "entities" that people, including the ancient Druids, have channeled for information?

Zechariah Sitchen Is Wrong?

There has been a growing craze for some years now on the internet, especially on Youtube, where people are going "hogwild" in repeating information from Zachariah Sitchen, information that is simply not true. Interestingly enough, people have even gone as far as to add other ideas into the equation, things of which Sitchen did not say, but nevertheless they act as though he did. Allow me to say that I'm not here to "bash" Mr. Sitchen as a person, but his inaccuracies of interpretation concerning the Sumerian text, needs to be known. This expose' won't be an all exhaustive one, but it shall be enough for the "Sitchenites" to see that they are parroting error.

As voiced in the preceding paragraph, there has been much talk about Sitchen's works concerning what the Sumerians call the "Annukai", planet Nibiru -also known as planet X to it's adherents- and the "ancient astronaut" theory, to name a few ideas spoken of. I want the reader to keep in mind, that, the information I'm about share with you is not a translation variant issue. It's an issue of translation incompetence, and pure conjecture of what's not actually in the text itself. Most important here; though Sitchen does have somewhat of a grasp of the Sumerian text and other Semitic languages (he fluently speaks Hebrew), it must be noted that he is not a scholar, nor is he peer reviewed in his work. With that said, we now shall proceed.

I would like to start off with his idea of the Sumerians knowing all of the planets in the solar system -the ones known in modern science- with the addition of another one that has an oblong orbit, and which comes near earth every 3600 years. That one being Nibiru. This idea is simply not supported by history nor the text itself. The ancients -all civilizations not just the Sumerians- recognized only 5 planets, which are the ones visible to the naked eye-Mars, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn, and Mercury. They also viewed the moon and sun as planets as well. The Sumerians attributed "gods" to each planet, and the cultures after them followed suit, in their own language. See figure chart below.

http://www.friesian.com/week.htm

When considering the evidence, Sitchen's theories fall apart. Also to note, according to the Chicago Assyrian Dictionary (CAD), Nibiru (Neberu) is another name for the planet Jupiter. See picture below.

Volume 11, N, part 1 page 145
http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/cad_n2.pdf

Lastly on Nibiru, according to the Astrolabe chart (below) it was seen every year in the month of Adar, remember that Nibiru is another name for Jupiter. Also, there is not a single Sumerian text that says the Annunaki come from Nibiru. A biological creature would not survive the orbit that Nibiru is said to have. I love talking to the Sitchenites that have a hard time understanding the basics to the impossibility of life on a planet that would have such an oblong orbit, that biological life could only exist part of the time when the planet reaches the right relation to and away from the sun. Once that position has passed, the planet would be too cold at points for life and then too hot at other points. The window for a perfect relation of distance to the sun -for life to exist- would be a minimum. So this 3600 year orbit nonsense is unwarranted indeed.

http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/nibiru.pdf

So what about the VA 243? (below) It has been said that this image from a Sumerian cylinder seal shows 11 planets orbiting the sun -hence showing our solar system- with a 12th planet (Nibiru - circled) incoming. There are a number of issues with such a statement. One being is that the writings on this seal have nothing to do with astronomy, nothing to indicate that the Sumerians were trying to "reveal" a distant orbiting planet coming back to say hello. Another issue, already stated earlier, the Sumerians never recognized more than 5 true planets in any of their literature.


There are yet even more issues with calling the VA 243 proof of a 12th planet. The image on the left -in the picture above- that looks like planets orbiting a sun, is actually not the sun at all! In the picture below is of a Sumerian zodiac that shows, from left to right: the moon, the sun, and a star. Notice that the sun image in the middle has wavy lines, and is always depicted this way in Sumerian literature.

(Picture: Ursula Seidl, Die Babylonischen Kudurru Reliefs)

(^---Closeup---^)

http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/VA243seal.pdf

In closing, after reading this, the pseudoscience of Sitchen's work should be seen for what it is. I have a few books of his, including The 12th Planet but I recognize his work for what it is, fiction. After all he is a fiction writer.

***

Recommended Reading:

1. http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/index.html

2. http://www.thelivingmoon.com/42stargate/03files/Sumerian_Astronomy.html

3. http://www.skepdic.com/essays/sitchin.htm

Ten reasons why aliens are actually fallen angels/demons

1. Aliens of our time are an exact match to the behavior of the demons and fallen angels mentioned in the Bible.
It's revealing how aliens can be "channeled" the same way that demons have been for millenia.

2. Aliens never affirm the deity of Christ nor do they claim to come in his name.
It's rather peculiar that aliens would come from so far away, just to speak evil of Jesus; attacking who/what he is, trash the Bible, and bash Christianity.

3. Aliens change their stories to delude man into believing their lies.
One example of this is that before man had been to outer-space or sent satellites there, the aliens would claim to be from planets such as Jupiter in our solar system. As time went on and man learned more about our planets-realizing that no one could live on such a planet of gas-the aliens changed their story. Now they claim to be from other solar systems and star clusters such as Andromeda and Pleiades etc. Planets, places, where we can't verify or deny if such information is true.

4. Aliens are said to be so advanced, and from so far away, yet they seem to need us for their survival.
There are various accounts of aliens taking tissue samples (for cloning?) and impregnating women, hence the entities known as Incubus and Succubus.

5. Alien abductions are stopped by invoking the name of Jesus.
Why would an alien be so afraid of the same name that demons were, as written of in the Bible?

6. Aliens bring ideas that man needs to unite worldwide for a new era of conscienceness.
This uniting involves being told to get ready for their leader (Antichrist?) and to forget about one's religion, which will make way for a one world religion/government.

7. Aliens often times contact "newagers" and occultists.
This is not always the case as there are all walks of life that have been contacted by "aliens". However, it is my position that these "space brothers" are not too interested in contacting Christians, and for one obvious reason.

8. Aliens are not opposed to human worship and they generally deny their creator; they assume that role instead.
A godly messenger never allowed humans to worship them, when mentioned in the scriptures. Aliens seem bent on letting man "know" that THEY seeded man (panspermia) and not a supreme creator i. e. YHWH.

9. Aliens give man technology but usually these "advancements" are for destruction.
There are "black projects" that governments have in their budget and these projects are usually tied to weapons of war. Some of the technology for such weaponry is said to come from extraterrestrials. Why don't these aliens ever give us life saving technology?

10. Aliens often times emit horrible odors, such as sulfur.
Some call it the stench of Hell.